The Ethics of AI-Powered Cloning: Should Digital Replicas of People Exist?

SWARNALI GHOSH | DATE: MAY 29, 2025

Introduction: The Rise of Digital Doppelgängers

Imagine hearing your own voice delivering a speech you never gave. Or seeing a digital version of a deceased loved one interacting with others online. Thanks to artificial intelligence, cloning human voices, faces, and even personalities is no longer science fiction—it’s reality. AI-powered cloning has exploded in recent years, with applications ranging from entertainment and advertising to healthcare and personal assistants. Companies like Respeecher have recreated iconic voices for films, such as young Luke Skywalker in The Mandalorian. Meanwhile, AI startups offer services that can mimic anyone’s voice with just a few minutes of audio samples. But as this technology advances, so do the ethical dilemmas. Should we allow digital replicas of people to exist? Who controls these clones, and what happens when they are used without consent, or worse, for malicious purposes? This article explores the ethical landscape of AI-powered cloning, weighing its benefits against its risks, and asking whether society is ready for a world where digital replicas walk among us. In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing, the concept of creating digital replicas—or "clones"—of individuals is transitioning from science fiction to reality. These AI-powered entities can mimic voices, facial expressions, and even personalities, offering possibilities ranging from preserving loved ones' memories to revolutionizing education and entertainment. However, as we delve deeper into this technological frontier, pressing ethical questions emerge: Should we create digital replicas of people? What are the implications for privacy, consent, and identity?

The Technology Behind AI Cloning

Before diving into the ethics, it’s essential to understand how AI cloning works:

Voice Cloning: AI voice synthesis, powered by deep learning, can replicate a person’s voice with startling accuracy. Companies like Eleven Labs and Respeecher use two primary methods:

Speech-to-speech: Modifies an existing voice recording to match a target voice (e.g., making an actor sound like Darth Vader).

Text-to-speech: Generates entirely new speech from text input, mimicking a person’s vocal patterns.

Deepfake Video & Image Synthesis: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can create hyper-realistic videos of people saying or doing things they never did. While initially used for entertainment (e.g., de-aging actors in movies), deepfakes have also been weaponized for misinformation and fraud.

Personality & Behavioural Cloning: Emerging AI models can simulate not just voices and faces but also speech patterns, mannerisms, and even decision-making styles. Several companies are developing AI chatbots designed to replicate the personalities of historical figures or deceased loved ones.

The Benefits: Why Digital Replicas Are Tempting

AI cloning isn’t inherently evil—it has legitimate, even transformative, applications.

Preserving Legacy & Memory: AI can recreate the voices of deceased actors (like Randy Travis’s AI-assisted song in 2025). Families could interact with digital versions of lost loved ones for therapeutic closure. AI cloning offers a novel way to preserve the knowledge and experiences of individuals. Imagine students interacting with a digital version of Albert Einstein or artists collaborating with a virtual Frida Kahlo. Such applications can make education more engaging and personalised.

Revolutionizing Entertainment & Advertising: Studios can bring back classic characters without recasting (e.g., James Dean in a new film). Brands can use AI voices for scalable, localised ads without re-recording talent. The entertainment industry is exploring AI clones to recreate performances of deceased actors or to generate new content without human actors. This technology can also allow fans to interact with virtual versions of their favourite celebrities.

Medical & Accessibility Uses: Voice cloning helps individuals with speech impairments (e.g., ALS patients) regain their voices. Virtual avatars powered by AI are being used to support therapeutic practices and help individuals develop social skills. For the elderly or those experiencing loneliness, AI clones can provide companionship, offering conversations and interactions that mimic human engagement. These digital entities can also assist in mental health support by providing consistent interaction and monitoring.

Creative & Artistic Freedom: Musicians can experiment with AI-generated vocals (e.g., the controversial "Fake Drake" track). Writers could collaborate with AI versions of historical authors.

Ethical Concerns Surrounding AI Cloning

Consent and Autonomy: Creating a digital replica raises significant concerns about consent. Can a person truly consent to a digital version of themselves that may outlive them and be used in unforeseen ways? The issue becomes more complex posthumously, where individuals can no longer provide or withdraw consent.

Privacy and Data Security: AI clones require vast amounts of personal data, including voice recordings, images, and behavioural patterns. Gathering, storing, and utilizing this information can threaten both privacy and the security of personal data. Unauthorized access or misuse of such data can lead to identity theft or other malicious activities.

Psychological Impact on Individuals and Society: Interacting with digital replicas of deceased loved ones can have profound psychological effects. While this may provide comfort to some, it can also hinder the grieving process or create dependencies. Moreover, the existence of such replicas blurs the line between reality and simulation, potentially affecting societal perceptions of relationships and mortality.

Potential for Misuse and Deepfakes: AI cloning technology can be exploited to create deepfakes—realistic but fake videos or audio recordings—that can spread misinformation, defame individuals, or manipulate public opinion. Such misuse poses threats to democracy, personal reputations, and societal trust.

Misinformation & Fraud: AI voice cloning has been used in scam calls, where criminals mimic relatives to extort money. Deepfake videos of politicians spread false statements, threatening democracy.

Identity Theft & Reputation Damage: AI-generated revenge porn (non-consensual explicit deepfakes) is now criminalized in California. Celebrities fear losing control over their digital personas—imagine an AI clone endorsing a product they oppose.

Job Displacement & Exploitation: Voice actors worry about being replaced by AI clones.

Legal and Regulatory Landscape

Right of Publicity and Intellectual Property: In the U.S., individuals have a 'right of publicity' that grants them control over how their identity is used commercially. However, this right is governed at the state level, and there is currently no unified federal law specifically regulating AI-generated replicas. This legal grey area complicates the protection of individuals against unauthorised digital replication.

Recent Legislative Efforts: Recognising the challenges posed by AI cloning, some jurisdictions are taking action. For instance, California's Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation to protect actors from being replaced by digital replicas without consent, even posthumously.

At the federal level, the proposed "No Fakes Act" aims to protect individuals from unauthorised AI-generated deepfakes and voice clones, holding creators and platforms accountable.

Legal & Regulatory Responses

Governments and organisations are scrambling to regulate AI cloning.

The US Copyright Office’s Stance: No copyright for fully AI-generated works—only human-modified outputs qualify. The FTC is cracking down on fraudulent voice cloning with new enforcement rules.

The EU AI Act: Requires transparency in AI-generated content and bans certain high-risk uses.

California’s 2025 AI Law: Makes non-consensual deepfake pornography illegal. Protects performers from unauthorized digital replicas.

Industry Self-Regulation: Companies like Respeecher enforce ethical voice cloning, requiring consent and fair compensation. Detection tools (like digital watermarking) aim to distinguish real from AI-generated.

Cultural and Societal Implications

Redefining Identity and Authenticity: Digital replicas raise complex questions about what it means to be authentic and how we define personal identity. If a digital clone can mimic a person's behaviour and responses, what distinguishes the original from the replica? This question becomes even more complex when considering the rights and recognition of such entities.

Impact on Human Relationships: As individuals form bonds with AI clones, there is a risk of altering human relationships. Dependence on digital companions may reduce real-world social interactions, potentially leading to social isolation or altered interpersonal dynamics.

Navigating the Ethical Landscape

To address the multifaceted ethical challenges of AI cloning, a multi-pronged approach is necessary:

Establish Clear Consent Protocols: Individuals should have the right to consent to or refuse the creation of their digital replicas, with options to revoke consent at any time.

Implement Robust Data Protection Measures: Strict regulations should govern the collection, storage, and use of personal data for AI cloning, ensuring privacy and security.

Develop Comprehensive Legal Frameworks: Governments should enact laws that specifically address the rights and protections related to AI-generated digital replicas.

Promote Public Awareness and Education: Educating the public about the capabilities and risks of AI cloning can foster informed decision-making and societal discourse.

The Future: Where Do We Draw the Line?

AI cloning is here to stay—but society must decide how to use it responsibly:

Stronger Consent Laws: Should individuals have legal rights over their digital likeness, similar to copyright? Could blockchain-based identity verification prevent misuse?

Ethical AI Development: Developers must prioritize transparency, fairness, and accountability. Should AI-generated content always be labelled?

Public Awareness & Education: Consumers must learn to spot deepfakes and question digital authenticity. Schools and media should teach AI literacy to prevent manipulation.

A Global Framework: The US, EU, and China are taking different approaches—will international treaties emerge?

Conclusion: A Double-Edged Sword

AI-powered cloning is a technological marvel with immense potential—but also unprecedented risks. While it can preserve legacies, aid the disabled, and revolutionize entertainment, it also threatens privacy, truth, and human dignity.

The question isn’t just whether digital replicas should exist, but how we govern them. Without ethical safeguards, we risk a future where identity is fluid, trust is eroded, and reality itself becomes uncertain. Cloning through AI offers groundbreaking opportunities but also brings significant ethical challenges. As technology continues to evolve, society must carefully consider the implications of creating digital replicas of individuals. Balancing innovation with respect for privacy, consent, and human dignity is crucial to ensure that AI cloning serves humanity positively without compromising fundamental ethical principles.

Citations/References

1. Guerrero, J. C. (2025, January 2). New 2025 California laws: Artificial intelligence, octopuses, cannabis cafes and more. ABC7 San Francisco. https://abc7news.com/post/new-2025-california-laws-artificial-intelligence-protection-octopuses-cannabis-cafes-more/15652909/

2. Preventing the harms of AI-enabled voice cloning. (2023, November 16). Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/policy/advocacy-research/tech-at-ftc/2023/11/preventing-harms-ai-enabled-voice-cloning

3. Respeecher. (2024, November 24). Ethics in AI: Making voice cloning Safe - Respeecher - medium. Medium. https://respeecher.medium.com/ethics-in-ai-making-voice-cloning-safe-fac547c0895c

4. From Drake to Randy Travis: how AI impacts music copyright in the US. (n.d.). https://www.wipo.int/web/wipo-magazine/articles/us-copyright-office-on-ai-human-creativity-still-matters-legally-73696

5. Softtech, A. (2025, April 18). Ethics of Generative AI: Key Considerations [2025]. Aegis Softtech. https://www.aegissofttech.com/ethics-of-generative-ai.html

6. (17) AI Voice Cloning for Ads: Ethics and Opportunities in 2025 | LinkedIn. (2025, April 30). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-voice-cloning-ads-ethics-opportunities-2025-robiz-solutions1-jycef/

7. Masood, A., PhD. (2025, April 4). Intellectual Property Rights and AI-Generated Content — issues in human authorship, fair use doctrine, and output liability. Medium. https://medium.com/@adnanmasood/intellectual-property-rights-and-ai-generated-content-issues-in-human-authorship-fair-use-8c7ec9d6fdc3

Image Citations

1. Van Rijmenam Csp, M. (2023, December 10). AI ethics: What is it and how to embed trust in AI? Dr Mark Van Rijmenam, CSP | Strategic Futurist Speaker. https://www.thedigitalspeaker.com/ai-ethics-what-is-it-how-embed-trust-ai/

2. Abdoullaev, A. (n.d.). Can artificial intelligence clone the human Brain? A World of Possibilities with AI & BCI. https://www.bbntimes.com/science/can-artificial-intelligence-clone-the-human-brain

3. Davies, P. (2024, January 29). AI is too expensive to replace humans in jobs right now, MIT study finds. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/01/23/ai-is-too-expensive-to-replace-humans-in-jobs-right-now-mit-study-finds